364.8396 139.1283 363.9149 134.7092 363.5038 130.9063 c 431.5374 476.9323 431.64 476.316 431.1263 476.1106 c 274.8583 104.8144 l [(enables faster measur)20(ement of disability)]TJ 318.8634 92.4873 319.4435 91.8852 320.277 91.8852 c 387.5518 560.1761 388.1684 565.7257 389.4014 570.8641 c h /GS2 gs Examined by comparing the baseline and follow-up scores of both the stable and improved groups. 360.4205 130.8038 360.5231 130.3925 360.5231 129.9816 c 0 Tw (The assigned values for all completed)Tj q h 253.2826 92.0952 l 280.683 93.1123 l 269.6581 101.8784 l 1.55566 0 TD (Reliability)Tj 330.9054 103.3574 m q [(Thr)20(ee techniques wer)19(e used for item)]TJ Q 467.3014 490.7036 461.2378 496.2533 456.0993 501.4947 c 291.5157 93.1923 l 268.6979 101.1181 l 363.7979 91.958 l /GS3 gs Matheson, L. N., J. M. Melhorn, et al. 322.8727 101.6464 l -0.0001 Tc BT Q 324.6779 103.9375 l 0 Tc 277.7787 93.1123 l 396.9039 174.8918 394.6429 174.1729 392.3822 173.7616 c 408.9278 136.9699 408.7225 139.5394 407.4893 141.0805 c (able to work versus unable to)Tj 0.78462 0 Td /GS2 gs Q f (25,)Tj (Missing Items)Tj S 355.5904 135.634 355.2824 139.5394 354.3571 143.136 c (r)Tj 284.6351 81.6181 l 387.3604 105.0107 388.0421 104.2275 388.0421 103.1474 c f 324.6563 104.4379 324.2067 104.6845 323.6994 104.6845 c T* . 234.2794 97.4126 l 272.7543 102.1582 272.8661 101.9902 273.0182 101.8784 c q 0.167 Tc 270.538 83.2026 l 279.6989 96.3608 l 396.5956 591.9319 398.9594 597.2761 402.8644 601.4897 c 361.3117 94.7421 361.7247 94.9956 362.2179 94.9956 c ET 0 Tw Construct validity was demonstrated by a standard t-test that verified change between the baseline and the repeated measures. BT 329.818 91.8852 330.4415 92.4365 330.4415 93.3427 c 280.7628 87.3945 l 451.2689 372.8269 l f 242.8373 89.3618 m 252.129 96.0405 252.129 92.0952 y The high correlation between Quick-DASH score and patient satisfaction and functional outcome indicates that the Quick-DASH questionnaire is a suitable tool for evaluating adult humeral shaft fracture outcomes. ET q 271.5143 94.3046 l 0 0 0 1 k 356.2296 104.9379 l -0.0001 Tc ET 10 0 0 10 63.8917 444.8636 Tm ET 279.2267 104.0546 l 276.3065 106.0947 l )]TJ (Initial testing has shown the)Tj 0 Tw 331.3766 91.958 l 316.5938 86.5029 l 272.4342 94.5605 m (M)Tj 355.7433 96.518 l [(available fr)20(ee of char)29(ge \(for non-)]TJ 277.8746 104.8144 l 379.7335 90.312 l DASH Manual - Digital Download This 300-page manual is designed to assist researchers and clinicians in studying and interpreting the DASH/ Quick DASH outcome measures. 0 Tc 369.9679 94.9956 370.7296 94.1982 370.7296 93.2846 c [(Internal Consistency)-10086(Cr)19(onbach\325)90(s alpha = 0.94)-8949(Cr)19(onbach\325)90(s alpha = 0.97)]TJ h Q (onbach\325)Tj q 341.3888 101.8715 340.8234 101.5742 340.1925 101.5742 c 247.7018 87.5844 l [(\311a faster way to measur)10(e)]TJ 279.2826 81.6181 m 472.1315 621.735 463.396 622.0437 456.2023 619.9882 c 14 0 0 14 36 745.5 Tm 369.0402 101.6464 l /CS2 cs 1 scn 259.6098 333.8635 l f 384.9249 94.9956 385.6065 94.2128 385.6065 93.1323 c 292.5638 93.2963 l 388.2714 187.5326 l -0.0002 Tc [(of the DASH Outcome Measur)20(e. Instead)]TJ 0.67351 0 Td 386.7736 93.1323 m ET [(people with musculoskeletal upper)50(-limb)]TJ Q f /GS3 gs -0.0002 Tc 366.6984 94.5971 l 0 -1.3 TD 10 0 0 10 36 692.8965 Tm (ove)Tj 257.483 97.4126 l 68.5379 439.8417 m 316.3477 91.6318 l 376.3195 101.9726 l [(disor)20(ders. 265.4337 86.6108 l -5.39205 -2.02 TD /F1 1 Tf [(useful self-r)20(epor)9(t outcome measur)20(e for)]TJ BT 0 0 0 1 K f 407.2835 228.5378 406.0503 225.6602 405.9476 222.7827 c /F1 1 Tf 0.61742 0 Td 285.5792 93.7924 285.2594 94.3764 284.5072 94.3764 c f 368.257 101.9726 l 266.6737 104.0546 l 372.4044 91.958 l 330.9054 102.5385 331.4274 101.9003 332.2609 101.9003 c /F0 1 Tf -0.0001 Tc 386.9351 170.37 386.9351 171.5005 386.8324 172.7338 c 361.1593 103.8359 m 0 0 0 1 k 247.7018 81.7065 l BT 377.6388 94.5971 l 0.026 Tw 313.4039 86.5029 l /GS3 gs (Change in gr)Tj 370.0187 106.8808 l (DASH. [1] DASH cannot be computed if greater than three items are missing. 0 -1.3 TD [(optional modules that ar)20(e scor)19(ed)]TJ f 480.1473 571.7892 479.7362 555.5516 480.4557 542.1914 c All Rights Reserved.Syntax is a registered trademark of Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.Syntax + y B G T U F S X Z P N V Q Y J E C M * O 6 / 4 5 &. 349.4943 106.5332 l 231.6825 81.7065 l !InstituteforWork&Health.The!tools!listed!on!this!website!do!not!substitute!for!the!informed! Q 369.7726 138.82 370.081 140.6695 368.5393 140.4642 c 333.7618 91.958 l 365.7921 102.5673 l q 409.0309 573.8447 409.0309 575.1807 409.1336 576.2084 c The assigned values are summed and divided by the number of questions answered. 0 Tc ET 398.8567 211.8889 396.3901 199.8652 393.8207 188.252 c [1] Level of Disability 329.3322 101.915 328.6217 101.5742 327.9259 101.5742 c /F1 1 Tf ET 366.6984 94.9233 l f 350.589 91.8852 351.1837 92.5161 351.1837 93.2846 c -0.0112 Tc Q 438.7314 371.6963 436.7786 373.649 438.2173 375.7044 c 237.3932 89.0483 238.8883 89.0483 y weaknesses of the DASH and Quick-DASH have been well investigated by both classical test theory. 330.8185 94.5971 l 395.876 232.6485 394.5402 220.2137 391.3542 209.2172 c 4.5 0 TD 0 0 0 1 k 257.483 81.7065 l 293.6759 92.1284 l f 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs The intended population for the DASH is any person with one or more upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. 299.2682 95.2407 298.8922 94.7124 298.4442 94.3525 c 413.039 108.0915 412.011 112.2023 412.628 117.8547 c (1)Tj "Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: one-year follow-up." 14 0 0 14 111.8256 737.0585 Tm 378.2042 101.9726 l [(averaged, pr)20(oducing a scor)19(e out of five. 453.7358 493.0674 454.4549 484.1264 456.2023 475.9048 c (ted by the Upper)Tj 382.8077 91.559 382.0177 92.2553 382.0177 93.2265 c 0 792 0 0 re 0 Tc 333.6314 104.9379 l 284.5072 94.3764 m 288.4435 94.5605 l S 416.2245 105.8307 417.9719 105.7282 419.2051 105.7282 c 387.5997 104.1987 386.9406 104.6845 386.2228 104.6845 c (items theor)Tj T* (Quick)Tj Insteadof 30 items, the QuickDASH uses 11items to measure physical function andsymptoms in persons with any ormultiple musculoskeletal disorders ofthe upper limb. 37.5 37.4999 537 717 re 0.028 Tw There was a significant interaction between groups for the pretest and post-test scores, indicating that the change in QuickDASH with time differed between stable and improved patients. 237.1911 89.0483 l 246.308 89.3618 l f [(The thir)20(d scale was cr)19(eated using Rasch)]TJ 0.1 scn 312.7804 81.6167 l 18.72 0.39999 TD 266.0497 86.6108 l q f [(optional high per)10(for)-1(mance spor)10(t/music)]TJ (\()Tj 440.3756 503.7552 439.8615 510.5381 438.0118 517.2185 c 247.1432 90.2133 245.1391 97.4126 y -1.70166 -1.30001 TD 0 Tw 0 Tc 0 -1.3 TD 353.3873 101.6464 l BT 364.4874 91.6318 l 244.3024 94.2998 243.3954 91.2431 242.8373 89.3618 c 428.3514 483.51 429.2763 476.5217 430.5094 469.533 c /GS3 gs Significantly greater reductions in disability among patients rating themselves as improved versus stable. 237.3932 89.0483 237.1911 89.0483 v "Assessing Validity of the< i> Quick DASH and SF-12 as Surveillance Tools among Workers with Neck or Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders." 0 Tc "Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)." 152.9747 439.5741 m 359.0421 101.5742 358.3243 102.2192 358.3243 103.2924 c f /CS2 cs 1 scn Q 61.7935 439.8409 m 283.3309 82.3383 283.4591 82.3061 283.6911 82.3222 c 288.3954 92.1284 l 372.3604 104.6845 371.7227 104.1552 371.6427 103.4736 c /CS2 cs 1 scn 257.483 106.853 l /GS2 gs [(calculate the optional four)50(-item module)]TJ q (Quick)Tj q The median baseline QuickDASH score was 0.00 (IQR 9.09). ET (fr)Tj [(incr)20(easing in popularity since its r)19(elease)]TJ [(based on their r)20(elative dif)9(ficulty;)]TJ 387.963 242.2063 391.0463 250.3252 388.6825 258.2383 c 337.5534 104.3002 l 357.0292 139.8475 354.6655 143.7529 355.3849 148.172 c (2013). q [(mor)20(e than 10 per cent of the items)]TJ 0 Tc 398.2398 132.9618 398.8567 132.448 398.4456 132.037 c -4.24707 -1.3 TD The QuickDASH, published in 2005 in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, is a subset of 11 items from the 30-item DASH and is a self-reported questionnaire in which the response options are presented as 5-point Likert scales. BT ET 0.84055 0 Td /GS2 gs Like the DASH, the)Tj [(DASH versions\) wer)20(e)]TJ 1 g 273.5543 104.8945 273.8663 104.8066 274.1222 104.6147 c BT 297.7562 93.7763 m 0 0 0 1 k 402.248 176.0224 402.4532 172.5285 402.7617 169.24 c 44.5181 118.4517 l 3.00317 0 TD (components: the disability/symptom)Tj 339.7863 93.8212 m 0 Tc /F12 1 Tf 442.02 446.2043 m /GS2 gs 277.9706 82.3784 l 10.719 0 TD 272.4342 92.1284 l /F2 1 Tf 292.3153 102.0781 292.8114 101.8061 293.3795 101.8061 c 390.9431 160.8125 390.1209 154.8518 389.9158 149.7136 c 283.3309 85.3144 l 363.0928 126.6929 361.4485 124.946 361.0374 122.8907 c 0 -1.3 TD The DASH has been translated in many different languages and has demonstrated to be a valid and reliable questionnaire for a variety of upper extremity disorders. /GS2 gs = endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /OP true >> endobj 9 0 obj [ /Separation /PANTONE#20123#20U /DeviceCMYK 7 0 R ] endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /OP false >> endobj 12 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream 376.4933 94.9956 377.254 94.2417 377.254 93.2631 c 366.3813 150.2274 362.2705 148.583 359.2904 146.8356 c 10 0 0 10 245.5181 693.681 Tm (scor)Tj The optional)Tj 1-844-355-ABLE, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab #1 Rehabilitation Hospital. 394.5402 160.2988 395.1571 154.2354 395.9792 147.4525 c )]TJ f 475.8312 631.4984 471.412 630.5733 467.7123 628.7239 c 419.6162 607.1422 l 404.9197 165.5398 404.9197 163.4843 405.2281 161.2238 c q ET Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. 479.0172 541.1636 l 248.0936 97.4126 l 387.6546 161.6349 385.0854 156.9072 383.9549 152.077 c 1 1 1 1 k The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Outcome Measure is a well-recognized self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any of several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. 40 0 0 40 50.5562 416.0223 Tm f 368.1261 91.559 367.6847 92.2334 367.6554 92.2334 c 249.516 96.2597 248.0936 96.2597 y 410.3667 605.8057 414.1692 605.7033 416.7387 607.2448 c 0.028 Tw 347.3917 91.958 l 426.6043 364.9133 427.3239 369.6408 431.2289 372.3131 c Shirley Ryan AbilityLab does not provide emergency medical services. h -0.0001 Tc 369.0402 101.9726 m 383.9549 152.077 m 326.5412 84.582 l /GS3 gs 9.44326 13.72 TD -0.0003 Tc 456.3049 422.3616 456.5103 423.0811 456.0993 423.0811 c 340.0841 93.8212 l 0 -1.3 TD 0 0 0 1 k 321.5743 96.54 l 238.2643 100.3461 m BT f /GS2 gs 1.33081 0 TD /CS2 cs 1 scn 327.7296 93.3427 m 324.047 105.0107 324.4025 104.8872 324.6632 104.6845 c 385.3938 538.9028 383.3385 547.5355 385.5992 555.3458 c 367.6768 94.3071 l 402.659 186.9162 401.7342 187.2245 400.912 187.1218 c 322.546 102.7993 l 317.609 81.9643 l 332.254 91.6318 l -1.17339 -1.30001 TD 18.6 9.1 TD 423.1102 267.282 415.4023 249.0919 407.7976 231.3127 c 355.0255 101.9726 l BT 331.3766 94.9233 l 222.5 153.646 170.75 454.324 re [(DASH also has two four)50(-item)]TJ 376.6818 104.3071 m [(patients \(r)20(esear)39(ch studies, pr)20(ogram)]TJ 341.5846 94.5971 l 0 Tc "How sharp is the short QuickDASH? q /F12 1 Tf 433.4901 459.5645 429.5847 449.2876 429.9956 439.5245 c 353.3873 105.5976 l f 288.7233 104.8144 l (M)Tj 385.3938 214.9723 385.2908 213.328 384.9823 211.7864 c 449.8304 352.8894 l Q (data is available on the )Tj 316.8693 104.9599 316.4127 104.4521 315.7023 104.3652 c 0.026 Tw 396.2871 92.0596 395.876 86.0987 396.3901 81.8854 c 362.7111 103.1474 m Q q [(r)20(esponses ar)20(e simply summed and)]TJ -0.0001 Tc 335.6613 91.958 l 332.174 81.9428 l 314.3756 93.6254 l 271.0663 91.3681 l BT 366.9976 142.8279 368.1284 142.2111 367.9229 141.3891 c 235.0094 101.2026 235.7018 101.8969 236.5558 101.8969 c 367.2785 101.9726 l /GS3 gs (oups)Tj 398.7536 108.6057 398.2398 110.4553 398.0346 113.0244 c 466.1707 473.541 463.2932 469.225 459.9019 466.3476 c W n )Tj 10 0 0 10 262.4564 334.8635 Tm 241.4633 99.1704 l 4.70874 0 TD 422.8017 374.8822 424.3433 371.6963 423.4185 368.5103 c Q f 241.9965 90.2075 241.848 89.6918 v Q 283.3712 91.288 282.515 92.0561 282.515 93.2163 c 280.1469 106.4545 l 332.841 91.958 l 0 Tw 0 -1.3 TD f -39.61123 -2.42 TD 10 0 0 10 243.3623 554.046 Tm (Quick)Tj BT 440.0673 506.7359 439.3478 494.9175 434.6202 482.6878 c 368.4367 105.625 377.1718 122.6849 370.6975 137.9978 c 0 -1.3 TD 479.8394 629.854 m 369.0402 106.5546 l BT (than the others, and was chosen and)Tj 10 0 0 10 222 640.8966 Tm endstream endobj 4 0 obj << /FL 3.2625 /Type /ExtGState /SA true >> endobj 5 0 obj [ /Separation /PANTONE#20293#20CV /DeviceCMYK 3 0 R ] endobj 7 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream ET 282.5789 81.538 282.411 81.7944 282.411 82.4345 c 282.411 85.3144 m 408.414 92.8816 m 330.2819 84.582 l 435.5455 616.4937 434.1065 616.0831 433.5927 617.3163 c 0 Tw BT 361.7568 130.8038 361.2427 131.1121 360.6263 131.0095 c q 277.2265 106.0947 l h A Young Scientist's Journey after a Stroke, Care by the Numbers: Skilled Nursing versus Inpatient Rehabilitation, WSJ: Recognizing Aphasia and Seeking Treatment, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Ranked No. 1 g 325.6202 84.3134 l /F1 1 Tf (OUTCOME MEASURE)Tj 0.026 Tw 323.4669 84.6543 322.8942 84.0092 322.8942 83.3276 c Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. [(esponse categor)-5(y)]TJ 464.9376 621.1186 472.44 620.8104 479.4283 619.9882 c -0.61082 -1.30001 TD of age to examine the factors that influence the Quick-DASH score and to understand the degree of potential upper limb impairment in the general population. /CS1 CS 1 SCN T* /F2 1 Tf 234.2382 87.896 l 0 -2.02 TD f 283.091 101.0942 282.715 101.038 282.5709 101.038 c 350.5309 104.2568 l -0.0002 Tc )Tj 331.3693 101.5742 330.5431 102.2192 330.5431 103.3432 c -0.0001 Tc 278.6666 104.8144 l 333.5518 94.749 334.0518 94.9956 334.5011 94.9956 c 252.129 96.0405 252.129 92.0952 y s q /GS4 gs 269.1381 92.0561 269.4579 92.6406 269.4579 93.2163 c (multiplying by 25. [(Equidiscriminative Item-T)92(otal)]TJ ET 428.9683 617.419 432.1538 619.3718 436.265 619.166 c 273.6661 104.1743 273.4823 104.2226 273.2821 104.2226 c [(awar)20(e that ther)19(e ar)20(e advantages to)]TJ 269.13 101.1181 l 1 0 obj << /OPM 1 /Type /ExtGState >> endobj 3 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream 247.7018 87.5815 l 404.3033 277.2509 403.9949 290.1999 407.6946 303.2516 c f -1.9211 -1.3 TD Beaton, D. E., J. G. Wright, et al. 385.1642 94.1835 384.504 94.6694 383.7863 94.6694 c 344.7091 94.749 345.2096 94.9956 345.6593 94.9956 c [(DA)-56(S)-29(H)]TJ 470.1789 600.1536 465.3485 588.746 459.0798 576.7221 c /GS2 gs 0.15 scn 281.8829 101.038 281.715 101.2944 281.715 101.9345 c h 10 0 0 10 36 245.76 Tm /GS3 gs 439.3478 427.0892 436.984 432.3305 436.8813 438.1881 c /CS2 CS 1 SCN q /GS2 gs 312.7804 101.6464 m 2.20044 0 TD 0 0 0 0 k 361.5001 102.3354 l 343.4113 94.9233 l /GS3 gs 393.6154 87.8457 m 333.9943 101.9726 m S q 288.4516 94.8325 288.6996 95.1445 289.1234 95.1445 c 267.4979 84.2426 l 360.5231 144.5749 362.7843 147.3498 364.9423 148.172 c 278.6828 101.8784 l 283.2831 104.0546 l T* [(though dif)10(fering in content. 407.7976 163.5875 410.1611 157.1129 411.0863 150.33 c 435.9565 430.9945 437.8061 426.5754 438.5256 422.0536 c -11.34547 -1.3 TD 316.5938 81.9643 l (wher)Tj S 285.171 86.6347 l 416.6356 119.7047 414.4776 119.3963 412.628 119.1911 c 397.8289 113.0244 l f 440.6044 333.8635 m (2009). When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary (original) source. ET -0.011 Tc (number of items with > 40% in)Tj Tj 280.7628 82.3784 l 0 0 0 1 k 0 Tc 238.2643 99.4126 237.5087 98.6567 236.5758 98.6567 c (of the items can be left blank\), no)Tj 0 0 0 1 k Q "Long-term subjective and functional evaluation after thumb replantation with special attention to the Quick DASH questionnaire and a specially designed trauma score called modified mayo score." 332.841 94.5971 l BT 291.9078 91.3681 l 357.7487 157.6267 362.7843 163.1763 368.2309 169.1367 c 356.1349 94.2417 l 0.1 scn 10 0 0 10 222 429.16 Tm 0.032 Tw 231.657 81.388 158.343 25.724 re 289.4354 101.038 289.2675 101.2944 289.2675 101.9345 c Q (2001). 362.3477 104.271 363.1535 105.0107 364.1681 105.0107 c 292.1956 94.3046 l 0.66699 -0.04445 TD f 0 Tw 315.3761 96.4165 l 17.4934 0 TD (2011). /GS3 gs 342.5997 101.9726 l 306.8204 107.1118 m 238.1012 100.3501 m 410.3667 402.7325 406.4613 405.7132 405.0229 410.4405 c f /CS1 CS 1 SCN 1.70166 0 TD 314.4191 86.5029 l The QuickDASH is a widely used reference of self reported disability. 282.515 94.3764 283.3712 95.1445 284.5072 95.1445 c The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now?. f 414.4776 245.3923 421.9794 258.444 426.5018 273.4482 c /GS3 gs 0.65443 0 Td QJOICF+Syntax-Roman @ 6|= /GS2 gs 351.546 94.5971 l 354.6124 101.9726 l (y)Tj 1.00536 0 Td 380.1525 75.9245 379.8442 73.5612 377.5831 74.486 c 315.9708 81.9643 l 241.9965 90.2075 244.0648 97.4126 y 294.5717 104.8945 295.2516 103.9663 295.2516 102.7026 c (elation (EITC))Tj 290.5956 96.3847 l )]TJ Shor)10(tening the DASH)]TJ Kennedy, C., D. Beaton, et al. (Evaluation and Comparison)Tj -5.62517 -2.02001 TD 367.6554 90.6386 l f 380.1251 94.5971 l 449.2136 352.2727 449.522 351.0395 449.1109 350.32 c 288.3954 94.3525 l 437.7035 385.2618 l 436.3676 446.8212 440.3756 440.8604 443.0474 434.4885 c 243.3966 91.247 244.3026 94.3002 244.5919 95.2749 c 263.7855 106.1108 l 17.37722 0 TD BT q (evaluated and compar)Tj (item DASH and with other markers)Tj /F10 1 Tf 292.1635 101.038 291.3073 101.8061 291.3073 102.9663 c 290.7794 101.8383 l 268.3859 91.288 m 0 0 0 0 k [(corr)20(elation with overall scor)19(es acr)20(oss)]TJ 281.099 96.3608 l /GS2 gs 345.6447 104.4594 345.4122 104.6845 344.8468 104.6845 c 267.6339 94.3764 267.3138 93.7924 267.3138 93.2163 c (Phone: (416) 927-2027 ext. 271.0663 94.3046 l 374.8087 137.6892 378.2 134.4007 382.1047 132.1396 c Scoring Patients are asked to answer all sections and respond based on their ability to perform activities over the past week; only one answer per question. 294.028 95.0644 l 278.8746 106.4545 l /F12 1 Tf 0.026 Tw (ed using data)Tj [4], The QuickDASH is an abbreviated version of the original DASH outcome measure. Q 340.0841 94.9233 l 349.3272 90.312 348.465 90.5004 348.3341 91.1674 c /GS2 gs 266.6578 101.1181 l It has two, 4-item, optional modules used to measure symptoms and function in athletes, artists, and workers who require a high level of function. 408.5172 155.8797 406.7698 160.7095 405.9476 165.6429 c Q 279.1869 94.9126 l This 3rd edition of The DASH and Quick DASH Outcome Measure User's Manual was published in 2011. 61.7935 415.2499 l T* 416.6356 221.858 412.4222 213.5333 411.3942 204.2843 c 417.5609 277.3535 423.1102 303.4569 431.1263 326.9912 c 392.6905 69.7584 391.2516 66.9836 389.4014 68.6278 c 371.6427 103.1474 m 273.1781 101.7661 273.3702 101.7104 273.6022 101.7104 c 315.9708 81.6167 l 252.129 96.2597 l [(ee dif)10(fer)19(ent scales)]TJ 326.9757 101.5742 326.1856 102.27 326.1856 103.2417 c 381.1476 101.5742 380.4298 102.2192 380.4298 103.2924 c 329.3322 104.1987 328.6725 104.6845 327.9547 104.6845 c f q 360.9854 94.394 m 247.7018 106.853 m q 320.8712 91.8852 321.611 92.4292 321.611 93.2412 c 283.3309 84.5546 l 285.3551 102.5502 l )]TJ h 10 0 0 10 36 632.9 Tm 356.0841 103.3432 l 253.2826 92.0952 l 385.2908 528.2148 384.4685 533.2505 383.8522 538.0807 c 360.9854 91.958 l 386.4214 174.1729 385.188 175.3029 383.8522 175.9197 c [(completed for a scor)20(e to be calculated. 282.411 86.5947 l T* 372.0421 91.958 l 367.2931 90.6386 l s -0.59287 -1.30001 TD 442.328 404.1716 443.0474 403.6579 443.1502 402.9383 c T* (patient evaluation \(i.e. 1.94215 0 Td /GS2 gs 280.2269 97.1445 l (2009). 407.6946 187.7383 l S 413.1417 587.8212 412.3195 591.2128 414.2718 593.0625 c . /CS1 CS 1 SCN (Quick)Tj 320.2404 94.6694 m -4.70874 -1.30001 TD 235.9357 89.0483 l 438.0118 486.7985 438.6283 491.6288 439.7589 496.6643 c 343.4113 91.6318 l 267.1937 101.8784 l 374.4268 101.915 373.716 101.5742 373.0206 101.5742 c 412.011 136.7645 411.7027 136.3534 411.0863 136.3534 c 244.7077 94.8759 245.7059 91.4321 246.3046 89.3676 c 277.2184 81.6181 l 10 0 0 10 104.0494 555.6966 Tm q 277.3226 97.1445 l 376.6964 104.3071 l 0 0 0 1 k [(27.5 vs. 52.6)-11683(M)]TJ 382.5538 105.0107 382.9093 104.8584 383.2354 104.561 c 368.334 146.1167 369.4645 147.9662 371.4169 149.0967 c 0.5 w 0.026 Tw 0 Tc /GS2 gs T* 444.4865 368.5103 447.6723 369.5383 450.0358 372.3131 c 335.5382 94.9956 335.6613 94.4448 335.6613 93.6835 c 314.4552 101.6464 l [(pr)20(ospective cohor)9(t \(i.e., 200 individuals)]TJ BT London, D. A., J. G. Stepan, et al. /GS3 gs 0 0 0 1 k 333.2037 91.958 l 477.2698 485.9763 474.7007 482.2767 471.9258 479.1934 c We suggest that a child whose Total Standard Score falls at or below the 5th percentile would be regarded as having 'slow' handwriting that is likely . In most cases Physiopedia articles are a secondary source and so should not be used as references. f /GS3 gs 371.4259 96.8662 l 272.9542 91.3681 l -2.35181 -1.3 TD 358.0343 94.5898 l 395.3623 455.9676 392.896 472.6163 393.1016 488.0318 c 438.2173 274.1675 433.1817 264.9185 429.5847 255.4635 c 446.6445 429.864 442.8422 439.3187 438.0118 448.1571 c T* 576 737.181 l (2007). 271.0663 92.1284 l Q 401.1174 267.1793 400.09 270.1599 401.5284 272.6263 c 0.026 Tw 430.4069 433.5638 432.0511 444.8685 432.668 454.7343 c 337.6549 105.0107 337.9161 104.7207 337.9161 104.3002 c f Enter your zip code . /F12 1 Tf 264.4176 96.5205 264.6737 97.1445 265.6896 97.1445 c 368.257 101.6464 l Q 290.1873 104.8144 l 408.1056 524.5149 407.0781 523.179 405.3308 521.9456 c 404.6118 210.1422 405.0229 213.4307 405.5365 216.5139 c 10 0 0 10 408 684.046 Tm 330.9054 81.6167 l 0 Tw 396.2871 142.6222 397.4176 138.5115 398.0346 133.4759 c (version of the )Tj 0.38886 0.00001 TD 419.102 138.6142 421.5685 135.5312 421.5685 131.5233 c 371.4259 91.6318 l 414.0665 143.2391 413.8611 147.4525 412.4222 150.9469 c q BT [(scor)20(e out of 100 by subtracting one and)]TJ 287.4755 94.3046 l h endstream endobj 19 0 obj << /Nums [ 0 << /S /D >> ] >> endobj 20 0 obj << /BaseEncoding /MacRomanEncoding /Type /Encoding /Differences [ 32 /space 38 /ampersand 45 /hyphen /period 48 /zero 50 /two 54 /six 65 /A 68 /D /E /F /G /H /I 75 /K /L 78 /N /O 82 /R /S /T /U /V /W 97 /a /b 100 /d /e /f 105 /i 108 /l /m /n /o /p 114 /r /s /t /u 119 /w /x /y 169 /copyright 201 /ellipsis ] >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Subtype /Type1C /Length 3494 /Length1 3494 >> stream S 452.3994 618.2412 448.6998 616.5968 445.3085 614.2332 c Fayad (2009): The F-QuickDASH-D/S scale had excellent correlation with the full-length F-DASH-D/S score (r=0.96). 234.2382 87.896 l 379.589 92.2841 l 0 0 0 1 k 460.7242 494.7117 468.1235 488.4429 475.934 486.6959 c 332.7614 86.5249 l -7.80454 -16.29573 TD /GS2 gs 386.0103 70.9916 386.3187 75.2051 385.8049 79.2132 c f 268.09 104.3344 m ((Rasch Analysis))Tj 342.5997 101.6464 l 333.2037 94.2924 m 331.3185 84.9082 l ET 370.6349 101.9726 l 326.606 102.3715 327.215 101.9003 327.9689 101.9003 c 313.8175 104.2202 l 10 0 0 10 47.3648 119.4517 Tm [(only at these high per)10(for)-1(mance levels,)]TJ "Internal consistency and validity of the QuickDASH instrument for upper extremity injuries in older children." 244.0648 97.4126 l 321.5743 92.2407 l Q 318.6671 82.3418 319.2765 81.8701 320.0304 81.8701 c 372.3417 141.3891 371.2116 141.4917 370.492 142.1086 c (E-mail: dash@iwh.on.ca)Tj -6.14698 -1.25 TD 253.2826 97.6328 253.2826 97.4126 v T* [(ngoing pr)20(ocess and is context specific. 330.6447 86.1479 l 8.74366 0.00001 TD 0.1 scn 314.4552 101.9946 l /GS3 gs 337.9816 94.6694 337.3146 94.1982 337.3146 93.27 c 0.25 scn /GS2 gs Journal of Hand Therapy 21(4): 354-365. 331.3693 81.9428 l 386.8324 110.6611 387.6546 115.6966 385.8049 119.7047 c (ovided that psychometric)Tj Patients with a Quick-DASH score below 15 could be considered totally recovered, and patients with a Quick-DASH score above 40 could be . ET 370.7296 92.226 369.8956 91.559 368.9962 91.559 c 241.464 87.5932 l 375.7316 101.6464 l 452.0911 617.0079 454.969 617.9327 457.9493 619.2687 c 333.6818 81.6167 l 0 Tc BT /GS3 gs The ranges listed for QuickDASH scores are normal (0-20); mild (21-40); moderate (41-60); and severe (61-80). 326.1856 104.271 326.9904 105.0107 328.005 105.0107 c 451.4747 562.0261 443.8697 545.9938 431.8458 534.8948 c 396.2871 80.3438 396.2871 77.8773 395.9792 75.7193 c 271.1141 101.8784 l [(alpha ~ 0.90\). 0 Tw 238.1012 99.4965 237.4091 98.8042 236.5558 98.8042 c 263.7775 87.3945 l 379.1681 90.6386 l 279.8427 82.3784 l ET (and low levels of disability\). 344.3615 94.2924 m q 0 Tw /GS3 gs 286.6751 82.3784 l 282.6349 106.0947 l 268.6979 101.8784 l /GS3 gs 296.8842 94.7124 296.5719 95.2407 296.5719 95.8486 c 10 0 0 10 63.8917 465.0636 Tm 372.8558 88.9763 371.4169 100.3838 373.4722 110.558 c 284.4349 104.0546 l 264.3937 86.6108 l 10 0 0 10 266.8804 554.046 Tm 0.1 scn /F12 1 Tf 9.98438 0 TD q 325.9826 81.9428 l (one r)Tj 412.011 128.132 411.0863 128.44 410.778 127.8236 c T* (was felt to be an attractive and sensible)Tj 456.5103 360.4945 m BT 316.275 96.8662 l /GS3 gs 238.8883 87.896 l /CS2 cs 1 scn 350.5309 101.9946 l h 363.2111 91.958 l 325.6202 81.6167 l 278.1708 97.1445 l (esented each of the key)Tj 324.7574 84.9804 325.2794 84.7485 325.6056 84.3134 c 408.9278 516.8076 408.3114 512.0798 409.0309 505.2969 c 322.5099 104.5249 322.8439 105.0107 323.6774 105.0107 c The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 88(8): 1782-1787. 384.4685 218.2609 384.4685 225.1465 385.8049 231.5184 c 265.6818 96.3764 l BT /F12 1 Tf 448.4946 507.5581 m 0.80348 0 Td ET -8.74366 -1.30001 TD /CS2 cs 1 scn 0.1 scn 0.026 Tw 0 Tc /F12 1 Tf /GS2 gs 336.0236 104.6118 l 336.379 104.9379 l /F11 1 Tf /GS2 gs -0.0002 Tc 10 0 0 10 468.1954 349.2083 Tm Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. DASH and Quick DASH Scoring Formula = ( [ (sum of n responses)/n] -1) (25) where n represents the number of completed items. Q /GS2 gs -0.011 Tc 449.7277 374.1627 447.4666 371.4905 444.6918 370.052 c 333.1242 81.9428 l 238.8883 87.896 l T* The effects of corticosteroid injection versus local anesthetic injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 133(6): 757-763. 385.188 144.3691 387.8604 155.0576 390.2237 165.9509 c /F2 1 Tf 330.4562 92.2119 l (etically equally spaced and)Tj 364.1202 135.7366 364.8396 128.3373 362.476 122.8907 c 263.8576 91.3681 m 366.6622 101.9726 m (The final decision of the accepted)Tj /F12 1 Tf (alpha > 0.90)Tj 479.5309 660.8909 m 387.5518 203.2565 390.4294 215.7943 391.6627 228.3325 c 283.923 104.0546 l )Tj ET BT 10 0 0 10 408 704.246 Tm The DASH and QuickDASH have two optional 4-item additional modules that can be used. 9.15625 0 TD 344.3615 91.958 l BT 265.9457 95.0644 l -9.21939 -1.30001 TD 384.4533 104.271 385.2589 105.0107 386.2736 105.0107 c 452.3994 427.8087 451.0636 433.769 447.1582 438.5993 c 319.0734 104.6845 318.4357 104.1552 318.3556 103.4736 c 332.254 91.958 l /F12 1 Tf 383.3009 101.8715 382.7354 101.5742 382.1046 101.5742 c -0.0002 Tc -0.0002 Tc 238.8883 87.896 l Polson, K., D. Reid, et al. 294.028 92.1284 m /GS2 gs 1 g 0 -1.3 TD 380.2552 108.2973 381.18 107.4751 382.208 107.4751 c ET Shoulder, Elbow & Wrist Arthroplasty PatientsAngst (2009). 374.8087 154.5434 373.0613 151.5633 370.3895 150.2274 c 280.299 91.3681 l 288.9154 92.1284 l 419.6162 339.632 421.9794 344.0511 425.6796 348.162 c 408.3114 226.7909 408.6198 228.5378 409.2362 230.7989 c Q 291.3073 104.1264 292.1635 104.8945 293.2995 104.8945 c 440.2726 614.0273 435.6481 612.1777 431.2289 610.2251 c The 11-item QuickDASH is a shortened version of the 30-item DASH instrument. /F10 1 Tf /GS3 gs /GS2 gs 438.4231 536.3338 446.336 550.4131 454.3522 564.6979 c q 10 0 0 10 447.5117 112.4084 Tm /GS2 gs 376.1445 153.9271 380.2552 155.4687 382.4133 159.1683 c 339.0763 94.9956 339.4313 94.8432 339.7579 94.5463 c 315.7023 104.351 l 281.715 104.0546 l 1.1056 0 Td BT /F12 1 Tf 367.2785 106.5546 l 362.9897 129.0567 l 351.1837 94.227 l /F1 1 Tf Q 416.8413 145.9109 419.7189 142.1086 416.5329 140.2584 c 241.4633 87.5932 l 576 346.398 l 423.7269 611.8695 427.0156 616.3913 432.0511 617.0079 c It uses the DASH scale and scoring method and allows for one missing response . (=)Tj best toddler socks with grips, collagen dressing advantages and disadvantages,

Oaks Funeral Home Obituaries, St Thomas Church Bulletin, Assetto Corsa Streets Of Toronto, Ideal Candidate Statement Examples, Articles Q